Top 25 vs ML
2026 · our ranking (wins above bubble, no polls consulted) next to the ML predictive ranking released after the same week's games. Gap: how many spots higher we have a team than the ML does. Who picks games better is on the Scoreboard.
Week 6
In both top 25s19/25
Average gap6.2spots, teams in both
Rank correlation0.57over the ML's 25
Biggest splitKentucky#7 here · unranked in the ML
| Ours | Team | ML | Gap | WAB | Record |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 01 | 1 | = | +1.45 | 6-0 | |
| 02 | 5 | +3 | +1.43 | 6-0 | |
| 03 | 6 | +3 | +1.35 | 6-0 | |
| 04 | 2 | −2 | +1.32 | 5-1 | |
| 05 | 12 | +7 | +1.17 | 5-0 | |
| 06 | 11 | +5 | +1.12 | 5-0 | |
| 07 | — | ML NR | +1.05 | 5-1 | |
| 08 | 17 | +9 | +1.00 | 5-0 | |
| 09 | 4 | −5 | +0.98 | 5-0 | |
| 10 | 22 | +12 | +0.79 | 4-1 | |
| 11 | 18 | +7 | +0.66 | 5-1 | |
| 12 | 8 | −4 | +0.65 | 4-1 | |
| 13 | — | ML NR | +0.61 | 6-0 | |
| 14 | 9 | −5 | +0.57 | 5-0 | |
| 15 | 20 | +5 | +0.42 | 5-1 | |
| 16 | — | ML NR | +0.39 | 5-1 | |
| 17 | 13 | −4 | +0.37 | 5-1 | |
| 18 | 21 | +3 | +0.30 | 4-1 | |
| 19 | 3 | −16 | +0.29 | 5-1 | |
| 20 | 10 | −10 | +0.26 | 4-1 | |
| 21 | 15 | −6 | +0.24 | 6-1 | |
| 22 | — | ML NR | +0.18 | 5-1 | |
| 23 | — | ML NR | +0.06 | 4-1 | |
| 24 | — | ML NR | +0.04 | 5-1 | |
| 25 | 14 | −11 | +0.01 | 5-1 | |
| In the ML top 25, outside ours | |||||
| 44 | 7 | −37 | −0.64 | 4-2 | |
| 34 | 16 | −18 | −0.31 | 3-2 | |
| 30 | 19 | −11 | −0.11 | 3-2 | |
| 72 | 23 | −49 | −1.54 | 3-3 | |
| 57 | 24 | −33 | −1.22 | 3-2 | |
| 26 | 25 | −1 | −0.00 | 5-1 | |
Week 7
In both top 25s18/25
Average gap6.9spots, teams in both
Rank correlation0.46over the ML's 25
Biggest splitKentucky#2 here · unranked in the ML
| Ours | Team | ML | Gap | WAB | Record |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 01 | 13 | +12 | +1.69 | 6-0 | |
| 02 | — | ML NR | +1.33 | 6-1 | |
| 03 | 17 | +14 | +1.30 | 6-0 | |
| 04 | 5 | +1 | +1.27 | 6-0 | |
| 05 | 11 | +6 | +1.19 | 6-0 | |
| 06 | 21 | +15 | +1.00 | 6-1 | |
| 07 | 2 | −5 | +0.88 | 6-1 | |
| 08 | 7 | −1 | +0.92 | 6-1 | |
| 09 | 1 | −8 | +0.86 | 6-1 | |
| 10 | — | ML NR | +0.84 | 7-0 | |
| 11 | 9 | −2 | +0.79 | 5-1 | |
| 12 | 15 | +3 | +0.74 | 6-1 | |
| 13 | 10 | −3 | +0.69 | 6-0 | |
| 14 | 3 | −11 | +0.53 | 6-1 | |
| 15 | 4 | −11 | +0.64 | 5-2 | |
| 16 | 20 | +4 | +0.51 | 6-1 | |
| 17 | — | ML NR | +0.27 | 5-1 | |
| 18 | 19 | +1 | +0.23 | 5-1 | |
| 19 | — | ML NR | +0.21 | 5-2 | |
| 20 | 18 | −2 | +0.19 | 4-2 | |
| 21 | 12 | −9 | +0.32 | 6-1 | |
| 22 | — | ML NR | +0.29 | 5-1 | |
| 23 | — | ML NR | +0.17 | 4-2 | |
| 24 | 8 | −16 | +0.03 | 4-2 | |
| 25 | — | ML NR | +0.19 | 6-1 | |
| In the ML top 25, outside ours | |||||
| 30 | 6 | −24 | −0.15 | 5-2 | |
| 34 | 14 | −20 | −0.32 | 5-2 | |
| 38 | 16 | −22 | −0.54 | 5-2 | |
| 31 | 22 | −9 | −0.17 | 4-2 | |
| 58 | 23 | −35 | −1.28 | 3-3 | |
| 32 | 24 | −8 | −0.19 | 5-1 | |
| 53 | 25 | −28 | −1.08 | 4-2 | |
Week 8
In both top 25s18/25
Average gap6.5spots, teams in both
Rank correlation0.59over the ML's 25
Biggest splitKentucky#1 here · unranked in the ML
| Ours | Team | ML | Gap | WAB | Record |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 01 | — | ML NR | +1.63 | 7-1 | |
| 02 | 4 | +2 | +1.59 | 7-0 | |
| 03 | 11 | +8 | +1.52 | 7-0 | |
| 04 | 3 | −1 | +1.39 | 7-1 | |
| 05 | 20 | +15 | +1.11 | 6-1 | |
| 06 | 10 | +4 | +1.08 | 7-0 | |
| 07 | 5 | −2 | +1.02 | 6-2 | |
| 08 | 1 | −7 | +1.00 | 6-1 | |
| 09 | 2 | −7 | +0.99 | 6-1 | |
| 10 | 13 | +3 | +0.69 | 6-1 | |
| 11 | 8 | −3 | +0.64 | 5-2 | |
| 12 | 7 | −5 | +0.62 | 6-1 | |
| 13 | — | ML NR | +0.47 | 7-1 | |
| 14 | 19 | +5 | +0.47 | 6-1 | |
| 15 | 23 | +8 | +0.55 | 6-2 | |
| 16 | 21 | +5 | +0.37 | 6-1 | |
| 17 | — | ML NR | +0.36 | 6-1 | |
| 18 | — | ML NR | +0.33 | 6-1 | |
| 19 | — | ML NR | +0.30 | 5-2 | |
| 20 | 9 | −11 | +0.53 | 5-2 | |
| 21 | 6 | −15 | +0.36 | 6-2 | |
| 22 | 18 | −4 | +0.26 | 5-2 | |
| 23 | — | ML NR | +0.22 | 6-1 | |
| 24 | 12 | −12 | +0.13 | 6-2 | |
| 25 | — | ML NR | +0.03 | 7-1 | |
| In the ML top 25, outside ours | |||||
| 38 | 14 | −24 | −0.55 | 5-2 | |
| 33 | 15 | −18 | −0.22 | 6-2 | |
| 32 | 16 | −16 | −0.42 | 4-3 | |
| 26 | 17 | −9 | −0.04 | 6-1 | |
| 36 | 22 | −14 | −0.49 | 5-2 | |
| 40 | 24 | −16 | −0.76 | 4-3 | |
| 29 | 25 | −4 | −0.38 | 4-3 | |
Week 9
In both top 25s20/25
Average gap6.7spots, teams in both
Rank correlation0.57over the ML's 25
Biggest splitBYU#6 here · unranked in the ML
| Ours | Team | ML | Gap | WAB | Record |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 01 | 7 | +6 | +2.00 | 8-0 | |
| 02 | 21 | +19 | +1.62 | 7-1 | |
| 03 | 11 | +8 | +1.47 | 8-0 | |
| 04 | 10 | +6 | +1.40 | 8-0 | |
| 05 | 5 | = | +1.30 | 8-1 | |
| 06 | — | ML NR | +1.05 | 7-1 | |
| 07 | 1 | −6 | +0.98 | 7-1 | |
| 08 | 15 | +7 | +0.89 | 7-1 | |
| 09 | 6 | −3 | +0.85 | 7-1 | |
| 10 | 4 | −6 | +0.97 | 6-2 | |
| 11 | 8 | −3 | +0.83 | 6-2 | |
| 12 | 9 | −3 | +0.95 | 6-2 | |
| 13 | 16 | +3 | +0.74 | 7-1 | |
| 14 | — | ML NR | +0.68 | 7-1 | |
| 15 | — | ML NR | +0.52 | 7-1 | |
| 16 | — | ML NR | +0.47 | 6-2 | |
| 17 | 18 | +1 | +0.45 | 7-2 | |
| 18 | 2 | −16 | +0.54 | 6-2 | |
| 19 | 3 | −16 | +0.43 | 6-2 | |
| 20 | 14 | −6 | +0.18 | 6-2 | |
| 21 | 12 | −9 | +0.09 | 7-1 | |
| 22 | 22 | = | +0.02 | 6-2 | |
| 23 | — | ML NR | +0.10 | 5-3 | |
| 24 | 13 | −11 | −0.06 | 6-2 | |
| 25 | 20 | −5 | −0.07 | 5-3 | |
| In the ML top 25, outside ours | |||||
| 33 | 17 | −16 | −0.49 | 5-3 | |
| 58 | 19 | −39 | −1.45 | 5-3 | |
| 53 | 23 | −30 | −1.31 | 5-3 | |
| 27 | 24 | −3 | −0.20 | 6-2 | |
| 29 | 25 | −4 | −0.27 | 6-2 | |
Week 10
In both top 25s19/25
Average gap6.3spots, teams in both
Rank correlation0.60over the ML's 25
Biggest splitKentucky#7 here · unranked in the ML
| Ours | Team | ML | Gap | WAB | Record |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 01 | 3 | +2 | +1.84 | 7-2 | |
| 02 | 13 | +11 | +1.78 | 9-0 | |
| 03 | 15 | +12 | +1.77 | 9-0 | |
| 04 | 2 | −2 | +1.64 | 8-1 | |
| 05 | 4 | −1 | +1.86 | 8-1 | |
| 06 | 1 | −5 | +1.57 | 8-1 | |
| 07 | — | ML NR | +1.31 | 7-2 | |
| 08 | 8 | = | +1.20 | 7-2 | |
| 09 | 6 | −3 | +1.15 | 8-1 | |
| 10 | 9 | −1 | +0.86 | 8-1 | |
| 11 | 25 | +14 | +0.73 | 7-2 | |
| 12 | 19 | +7 | +0.72 | 8-1 | |
| 13 | 16 | +3 | +0.70 | 6-3 | |
| 14 | — | ML NR | +0.84 | 8-1 | |
| 15 | 11 | −4 | +0.62 | 7-2 | |
| 16 | — | ML NR | +0.59 | 7-2 | |
| 17 | 14 | −3 | +0.42 | 6-3 | |
| 18 | 17 | −1 | +0.38 | 7-2 | |
| 19 | 12 | −7 | +0.35 | 7-2 | |
| 20 | 10 | −10 | +0.16 | 8-1 | |
| 21 | — | ML NR | +0.15 | 8-1 | |
| 22 | 5 | −17 | −0.00 | 6-3 | |
| 23 | — | ML NR | −0.01 | 7-2 | |
| 24 | 7 | −17 | −0.06 | 6-3 | |
| 25 | — | ML NR | −0.11 | 6-3 | |
| In the ML top 25, outside ours | |||||
| 26 | 18 | −8 | −0.14 | 6-3 | |
| 69 | 20 | −49 | −2.04 | 5-4 | |
| 45 | 21 | −24 | −1.04 | 6-3 | |
| 33 | 22 | −11 | −0.66 | 6-3 | |
| 32 | 23 | −9 | −0.63 | 5-4 | |
| 31 | 24 | −7 | −0.43 | 7-2 | |
Across the season
| Week | In both top 25s | Average gap | Rank correlation |
|---|---|---|---|
| W6 | 19/25 | 6.2 | 0.57 |
| W7 | 18/25 | 6.9 | 0.46 |
| W8 | 18/25 | 6.5 | 0.59 |
| W9 | 20/25 | 6.7 | 0.57 |
| W10 | 19/25 | 6.3 | 0.60 |
The two answer different questions. Ours: what has a team earned? The ML engine: how good is it, and who would win on a neutral field next week? It reads play-by-play efficiency, Elo and roster talent, so a team that keeps winning close games can rank lower there, and a strong team with bad luck higher.